🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to restart nuclear discussions with the United States on condition that it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi declared exclusively dialogue produced results, and shared recent overtures had been made by intermediaries to reopen negotiations with the Trump administration. He said Iran had zero undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Navigating a Complex Path

The foreign minister is treading a challenging path since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be proceeding from a position of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged stronger militarily and mentally from the Israeli-US attack on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Talks Unexpectedly Terminated

The previous five rounds of negotiations between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a two-week conflict that culminated with the American leader declaring the sites had been eliminated. Subsequently, Western states employed their authority to restore global restrictions, but Iran asserts they have not had a major impact.

Perfect Agreement Suggested

Iranian officials claimed they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with US participation could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have continued and the US could be confident that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been settled in the talks that US nuclear scientists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a natural consequence of the consortium proposal. Diplomats asserted three times they had achieved a deal with the US representative the American negotiator only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Current Situation

Iranian officials declared the consortium offer was now no longer available, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be revived in various formats if discussions reopen.

The American leader recently said he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to resume discussions, but privately Iran's diplomats state they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from Washington either straightforwardly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been charged of inactivity in the wake of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran says dialogue is not part of a spectacle.

Political Stance

In his speech to the forum, intended to depict the US as a hegemonic power that abuses the notion of international law, Araghchi declared the two-week conflict showed the conflict could not be ended by armed force. He said the assaults commenced with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and concluded with an absolute demand for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with complete American awareness and cooperation, making faith challenging to reestablish.

Diplomacy Continues the Primary Answer

The foreign minister declared: "It was not Iran that had deserted dialogue; it was the United States and the western countries that had always attempted to enforce their will during the discussions. Negotiations can still be viable and remains the ultimate solution to settle conflicts, but its criteria, guidelines and tenets must be followed."

"In case they talk to the Iranian people with the tone of respect and honor, they will receive a reply in the identical approach."

Repair and Rebuilding

In what is described by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of restoration and recovery, Araghchi claimed he was confident Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been restored. We acquired multiple understandings from this engagement; we have discovered our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He stated: "We managed to survive this engagement. Our nuclear technology, which they intended to obliterate, remains in place. The facilities and machinery, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is important is the will of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but did not succeed to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have grown stronger, more united, and more supportive of the administration and the nation in the wake of this assault."