🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.